A couple days ago I received this E-Mail from Bob Barr (having been on the 2008 mailing list) - the article also ran in the Atlanta paper. Here it is - and it's dead on point:
as published in The Atlanta Journal ConstitutionMonday, June 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM The secret government "Terrorist Watch List," reportedly already swelled to more than 1.1 million names, will have an addendum, if gun control advocates in Congress have their way. This new addendum — also to be cloaked in secrecy — would empower the U.S. Attorney General to deny a person the ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights to purchase a firearm.While it is not surprising that some members of Congress are again using fear of terrorism to implement a gun-control agenda, the openly unconstitutional legislative language proponents are employing is troubling.Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) is leading the effort in the Senate, while another well-known gun control advocate — Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) — is directing the House initiative. They have introduced identical bills — the "Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009." This proposal would give the attorney general the power to unilaterally and in secret develop a watch list of persons believed to be unworthy of possessing a firearm or any explosive.This new "dangerous terrorist" watch list would include names based not on hard evidence of criminal activity, but on nothing more than the subjective conclusion by the attorney general that a person is "appropriately suspected" (whatever that means) of engaging in some manner of assisting or preparing for acts of domestic or international terrorism. The American people would never be privy to what criteria might be employed by the attorney general to determine whether someone is an "appropriate suspect," and they would have no way of knowing why they might be denied the ability to purchase a firearm.If a person were to be refused "permission" to purchase a firearm or explosive, and if they subsequently filed a lawsuit in federal court to find out why, the government still could keep such information secret. In other words, the attorney general could deny a U.S. citizen the ability to own a firearm, and never have to give the reason.For legislators like Lautenberg and King, who apparently have absolute faith in unelected government officials to make the right decisions for the right reasons at the right times (and never be required to explain those decisions), one has only to consider the checkered history of post-9/11 "terrorist" watch lists to see the folly of such perspective. Stories abound of persons denied the ability to board a commercial aircraft, or greatly delayed in being allowed on board, for no reason other than their name erroneously appeared on some "watch list." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), and Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), have been among this not-so-elite group.A report earlier this year by the FBI's inspector general chronicled extensive internal problems with the terrorist watch list maintained by that agency. The IG found numerous examples of inaccuracies, incomplete entries, out-of-date information and inclusion of information "unrelated to terrorism." While the inconvenience of not being able to board an airliner for a business trip or a vacation can be a real headache, being refused the ability to purchase a firearm to protect one's life clearly raises the stakes.The government already has remedies already at its disposal to keep firearms out of the hands of known or suspected terrorists. Under existing federal law, there are numerous categories of persons prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms; including persons in violation of immigration laws, convicted felons, illicit drug users and others. And if a person truly is a known or suspected terrorist, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — as the federal law enforcement agency primarily responsible for enforcing the nation's gun laws — certainly should be made aware of that information. We don't need a secret, anti-Second Amendment watch list to implement effective law enforcement in America.
###Bob Barr, an Atlanta attorney, is a former member of Congress and Libertarian presidential candidate.
To donate by mail: Barr 2008 Presidential Committee900 Circle 75 Pkwy., Ste. 1280Atlanta, GA 30339To donate by phone:Call 770/836-1776Paid for by Barr 2008 Presidential Committee.
Federal law requires us to report the name, address, and name of employer and occupation for any individual whose aggregate contributions total over $200 in a calendar year. Corporate contributions and gifts from foreign nationals are prohibited. Personal Credit Card gifts only. Contributions are not tax deductible for income tax purposes. Limit of $2,300 per person per election and $4,600 per couple if signed by both parties and drawn on a jointly held bank account.
Bloated Government, Totally Worthless Politicians - And, It Gets Worse From There (UPDATE) And Now We Have Trump/Biden
Popular Posts In The Past Week
-
As you know, pot is used by the population for a variety of reasons - from getting high recreationally, to pain relief, as a sleep aid and m...
-
The control of the peons opinions continues - shamelessly - as in this example - http://blog.norml.org/2010/02/05/times-square-billboard-fro...
-
Blowback indeed. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-oew-perri2-2010feb02,0,1124601.story couldn't happen to a nicer group...
-
Contempt for law from our law enforcers? Really? Are they that beholden to the kickbacks from the `sold' `seized pot' that they have...
-
Congressman Proposes 25 Years In Prison For Pot - http://blog.norml.org/2009/06/15/congressman-proposes-25-years-in-prison-for-pot/ Yep, a-...
-
ONLY the very heaviest REAL politics makes the pages of this website - and this qualifies. YOU need to study and be aware of the whole 3D pr...
-
Despite the MSM cheerleading of the economy and the world economy - the ponzi-game continues - http://www.jackliberty.com/fed-starts-program...
My Politics
I've voted for the Libertarians the last 10 elections for President. I do not believe in the Republinuts or the Democraps, or, the big media that supports them.
Because of the above - my views, IMO, are the real independent; THE `Eagle' views, and not the `centrist' `independent' views of those that alternate between the Jackass and the Elephant.
Thanks for checking out my politics blog.
Because of the above - my views, IMO, are the real independent; THE `Eagle' views, and not the `centrist' `independent' views of those that alternate between the Jackass and the Elephant.
Thanks for checking out my politics blog.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Watch lists, guns and government - By Bob Barr
Labels:
bloated government,
Bob Barr,
guns,
libertarian,
watch lists
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment