So, the big media talking heads played the fool again - announcing the `big' change in pot policy by the Federal Government. Now, being a 100% skeptic on anything said by our media - let alone being a 200% skeptic on anything the media says the government is doing about marijuana - I thought I'd look at the words used for this policy change.
"And while the policy memo describes a change in priorities away from prosecuting medical marijuana cases, it does not rule out the possibility that the federal government could still prosecute someone whose activities are allowed under state law."....."In particular, the memo urges prosecutors to pursue marijuana cases which involve violence, the illegal use of firearms, selling pot to minors, money laundering or other crimes."..."At the same time, the officials said, the government will still prosecute those who use medical marijuana as a cover for other illegal activity. The memo particularly warns that some suspects may hide old-fashioned drug dealing or other crimes behind a medical marijuana business." ..."The memo, the officials said, emphasizes that prosecutors have wide discretion in choosing which cases to pursue,"
Say what? You call this progress? Is it really possible that all this hype was focused on these words only? ..."it is not a good use of federal manpower to prosecute those who are without a doubt in compliance with state law."
So, in other words - treat the user and the distributor as guilty until proven innocent. And, since WHEN is it EVER a good use of federal manpower to prosecute those who are without a doubt in compliance with state law? AND, THAT IS THE PROGRESS? Oh please.
Sorry pal - seems like a lot of hot air trial balloon to me. One bag of hot air to lull to sleep those that would desire real change. The kind of feel good change you can't believe in.
More links for today:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-Newsbreak-New-medical-apf-4109207182.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode= Here's the link to the `change' in policy.
Gallup: Support for legalizing marijuana at an all-time high - http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/gallup-support-for-legalizing-marijuana-at-an-all-time-high/ Worthy of a read.
If Pot Prevented Cancer You Would Have Read About It, Right? - http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/gallup-support-for-legalizing-marijuana-at-an-all-time-high/ Or, does the free media only repeat what told by the politicians - one of their clients who pay big time money to advertise on their stations once a year.
Bloated Government, Totally Worthless Politicians - And, It Gets Worse From There (UPDATE) And Now We Have Trump/Biden
Popular Posts In The Past Week
-
Within the past week or so I posted about the four `marketing categories' of all people concerning cannabis http://realheavypolitics.blo...
-
From the dictionary the definition of `ruse' - a wily subterfuge - `ruser' - to dodge, deceive. I present the exact definition from ...
-
Decades Ago, there was a High Times magazine cover that had a question posed to a baseball star - the question was something like - If Bowie...
-
BTW, the blog in St. Louis Source felt the need to put a ? at the end of their statement of fact. The comments at the video indicate the on...
-
Some protest methods are simply more visual: The Story And Picture http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/media/ALeqM5gh7rHS_wFhq0lBrvo...
-
Now, this is a heck of a statement from Seattle and one worth noting -- too bad the media again has dropped the ball on new views http://www...
-
The disconnect between the MSM cheerleading the economy and the REAL economy is getting to be beyond belief. - http://crooksandliars.com/sus...
My Politics
I've voted for the Libertarians the last 10 elections for President. I do not believe in the Republinuts or the Democraps, or, the big media that supports them.
Because of the above - my views, IMO, are the real independent; THE `Eagle' views, and not the `centrist' `independent' views of those that alternate between the Jackass and the Elephant.
Thanks for checking out my politics blog.
Because of the above - my views, IMO, are the real independent; THE `Eagle' views, and not the `centrist' `independent' views of those that alternate between the Jackass and the Elephant.
Thanks for checking out my politics blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment